Thursday, September 10, 2009

On blogging

I intern for a green-living magazine, so I like to visit Treehugger to get ideas for the blog on our magazine’s site. The coverage keeps up with current issues within the “green” movement and most of the research and links are helpful and legitimate.

In criticism, Treehugger definitely has an agenda. But, I also have to say that the name makes the agenda very obvious. The blog is run by a company that calls itself a media company, but also offers green “advice” to other companies. Essentially, they are a consulting company centered on sustainability with a great self-promotional blog.

One of the greatest things about this blog is the organization. The categories are well chosen for the topic of the blog, and it makes the site easy to navigate. Plus, it has a games tab, which is a fun little time-waster.

Along the right side bar, once you get past the ads, there are some additional links. One contains a list of interviews with various people. Another has their top tips for being green. Also, the blog’s SEO must be good because it often pops up often when I do research for my blog posts at my internship.

The tone of the blog is often witty, but also very pro-environment. If you are looking for light reading that doesn’t make you feel guilty about driving to the grocery store instead of walking, then this blog is not for you.

Friday, September 4, 2009

Ethical? the media's use of "citizen journalists" as sources during Iran's election

During the recent election in Iran, many journalists were detained and/or prevented from reporting on the events following the election. Instead, the world's media organizations reported on the conflicts using tweets, YouTube posts and other forms of new media posted by Iranian citizens in the midst of the action.

Until the advent of new media, respectable world news organizations would be wary of using such reports because they are unconfirmed. However, in this case, it could be argued justifiable because they didn't have immediate access to confirmed reports. The public deserves to know what is going on in Iran, and if journalists are prevented from reporting, then the news outlets have little choice but to use such accounts.

The news outlets seem to agree with such logic. In fact, many news organizations ran articles about the important role new media played in the election. So, the question is, does the benefit of these new ways of obtaining information override traditional journalistic ethics in certain situations?

For one, in the case of the Iranian elections, the world media was in general upfront about where the information was coming from. Second, similar reports from thousands of people covering the same events are unlikely to be fabricated. Third, as part of the media's audience myself, I would rather get information from these "citizen journalists" than be in the dark, assuming the media discloses where the information was obtained from.